Executive summary
A growing small and medium business ran its production workloads on AWS with limited visibility into system health, inconsistent backups and rising costs. It needed stronger security and audit readiness without affecting performance or availability. DevOps TechLab reviewed the environment area by area, put the right controls in place and applied cost optimisation, reducing AWS costs by approximately 25–35% and aligning the environment with AWS Well-Architected best practices.
- Client
- SMB running production workloads on AWS (not named)
- Business problem
- Limited visibility, inconsistent backups, audit gaps and rising cloud costs.
- What we delivered
- A secured network design, monitoring, automated backups, audit trails and cost optimisation.
- Cost outcome
- AWS costs reduced by approximately 25–35%
- Standard
- Aligned with AWS Well-Architected best practices
The business challenge
The client’s AWS environment had grown without the controls a production business needs. There was limited visibility into system health, backup practices were inconsistent, costs were rising, and stronger security and audit readiness were needed, all without hurting performance or availability.
Why it mattered
- Limited visibility
There was limited visibility into system health, so problems were harder to spot early.
- Recovery at risk
Inconsistent backups put the ability to recover from a failure in doubt.
- Audit exposure
There was no central record of activity to show auditors or customers.
- A bill that kept growing
Cloud costs were rising without a clear plan to control them.
What the client set out to achieve
- Strengthen security and access controls.
- See system health before problems reach customers.
- Make backups automatic and verifiable.
- Be audit-ready, with a central record of activity.
- Reduce AWS costs without affecting performance or availability.
The solution: fix each risk area, then optimise cost
DevOps TechLab reviewed the environment area by area and put a specific control in place for each gap.
Security Limited controls; audit readiness needed
→Dedicated VPC, private subnets, restricted security groups, controlled SSH
Monitoring Limited visibility into system health
→CloudWatch alarms for CPU, memory and disk
Backups Inconsistent backup practices
→Automated backups with monitoring and retention checks
Audit trail No central record of activity
→CloudTrail and VPC Flow Logs, centralised logging
Cost Rising cloud costs
→Reserved Instances, dev servers off after hours, storage lifecycle: about 25–35% lower
Key design choices
- Network isolation first
A dedicated VPC with public and private subnets, restricted security groups and controlled SSH access.
- Monitoring that warns early
Amazon CloudWatch alarms for CPU, memory and disk.
- Backups you can prove
Automated backups for EC2 and managed databases, with monitoring and retention checks.
- Pay less for steady workloads
Reserved Instances for steady production, development servers stopped outside business hours, and storage lifecycle policies to cheaper tiers.
Security and governance
Security and audit readiness were built into the environment, not added afterwards.
- Private by default
Workloads sit in private subnets with restricted security groups.
- Controlled access
SSH access is controlled and limited.
- Full audit trail
AWS CloudTrail and VPC Flow Logs record activity centrally.
- Verified recovery
Backups are monitored and retention is checked regularly.
Architecture on AWS
| AWS service | Role in the solution |
|---|---|
| Amazon VPC | Isolated network with public and private subnets |
| Amazon EC2 · Reserved Instances | Production compute, at a lower committed price for steady workloads |
| Amazon CloudWatch | Alarms for CPU, memory and disk |
| AWS CloudTrail · VPC Flow Logs | Centralised logging and audit trail |
| Automated backups | Automated backups for EC2 and managed databases, with retention checks |
| Amazon S3 lifecycle policies | Moves storage to cheaper tiers automatically |
How we delivered
- 01Discover
Reviewed infrastructure and workload patterns, network and access exposure, backup, monitoring and logging gaps, and cost drivers.
- 02Re-architect
Dedicated VPC with public and private subnets, restricted security groups, controlled SSH and automated backups.
- 03Operate
CloudWatch alarms, centralised logging and audit trails, and backup monitoring with retention checks.
- 04Optimise cost
Reserved Instances, dev servers off out of hours, and storage lifecycle policies.
Business outcomes
The business now runs on an environment it can trust, at a lower monthly cost.
- AWS costs down about 25–35%
Reserved Instances, scheduling and storage tiering reduced the bill.
- Security posture significantly improved
Network isolation, restricted access and least-privilege controls.
- Problems seen early
Proactive monitoring and alerting on system health.
- Backup and audit readiness
Verified backups and a central audit trail.
- Well-Architected alignment
The environment follows AWS Well-Architected best practices.
What’s next
With the foundations in place, the environment is ready for further growth. DevOps TechLab continues to review cost, security and reliability as the workload grows.
DevOps TechLab is an AWS Advanced Tier Services Partner with the AWS Generative AI Competency and AWS SMB Competency. We design, build and run cloud and generative AI solutions on AWS for growing businesses, with 265+ cloud environments under management.
Is your AWS environment ready for the next stage of growth?
Book a 20-minute review with an engineer. You leave with the three biggest risks and savings in your setup, in writing.







